<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustainability Council of New Zealand &#187; labelling</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/tag/labelling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 02:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GM Trojan Horses</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/gm-trojan-horses/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/gm-trojan-horses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US plans to get other countries to bring their GM food laws into line with its own and New Zealand needs to make clear its protections are non-negotiable. Read [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/gm-trojan-horses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Makes First Real Move on Nanomaterials</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/epa-makes-first-real-move-on-nanomaterials/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/epa-makes-first-real-move-on-nanomaterials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 21:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Know]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a critical first step to regulating nanomaterials, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has made it compulsory to label for nanoscale ingredients in cosmetics. The use of nanomaterials has been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/epa-makes-first-real-move-on-nanomaterials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johnson &amp; Johnson Opposes Labelling Nanocosmetics &#8211; Council response</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/johnson-johnson-opposes-labelling-nanocosmetics-council-response/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/johnson-johnson-opposes-labelling-nanocosmetics-council-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the 2012 review of New Zealand&#8217;s cosmetics regulations, global personal care products company Johnson and Johnson opposed labelling of nanocosmetic ingredients. The company requested a further opportunity to make [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/johnson-johnson-opposes-labelling-nanocosmetics-council-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labelling nanocosmetics welcome but more needed to manage risks</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/labelling-nanocosmetics-welcome-but-more-needed-to-manage-risks/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/labelling-nanocosmetics-welcome-but-more-needed-to-manage-risks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, the EPA came forward with a proposal to label nanoscale cosmetic ingredients as part of a number of proposed amendments to the cosmetics regulations. The Sustainability Council made [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/labelling-nanocosmetics-welcome-but-more-needed-to-manage-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over 80% Support the Requirement to Label GM Foods</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/over-80-support-the-requirement-to-label-gm-foods/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/over-80-support-the-requirement-to-label-gm-foods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Genetic modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Know]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 80% of New Zealanders believe the current requirement to label genetically modified foods should be retained, according to a Consumer Link poll. Just 10% believe the regulations should not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/over-80-support-the-requirement-to-label-gm-foods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right to Choose GM Free Food on the Line with Free Trade Deal?</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/right-to-choose-gm-free-food-on-the-line-with-free-trade-deal/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/right-to-choose-gm-free-food-on-the-line-with-free-trade-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will losing the right to choose GM free food be a price of the next and biggest free trade deal? The US has made clear that a priority for it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/right-to-choose-gm-free-food-on-the-line-with-free-trade-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will GM Free be Free Traded Away?</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/will-gm-free-be-free-traded-away/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/will-gm-free-be-free-traded-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Know]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will losing the right to choose GM Free food be a price of the next and biggest free trade deal? The US has made clear that a priority for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/will-gm-free-be-free-traded-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case for proper regulation of nanocosmetics</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/1116/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/1116/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 03:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, the Council urged ERMA to propose mandatory labelling and safety testing of nanoscale cosmetic ingredients and that it review the regulatory definition of the nanoscale to ensure that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/1116/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council proposes rules for nanocosmetic ingredients</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/council-proposes-rules-for-nanocosmetic-ingredients/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/council-proposes-rules-for-nanocosmetic-ingredients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, the Sustainability Council wrote to ERMA, urging that in the annual review of cosmetics regulation, the regulator propose mandatory labelling and risk assessment of nanoscale cosmetic ingredients and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/council-proposes-rules-for-nanocosmetic-ingredients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
