<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustainability Council of New Zealand &#187; Submissions</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/category/submissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 02:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Risk Bearers Best Placed to Make Decisions</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/risk-bearers-best-placed-to-make-decisions/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/risk-bearers-best-placed-to-make-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 06:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a local community does not itself want to amend a council plan to allow a particular RMA activity to proceed then that is a good sign that it is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/risk-bearers-best-placed-to-make-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johnson &amp; Johnson Opposes Labelling Nanocosmetics &#8211; Council response</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/johnson-johnson-opposes-labelling-nanocosmetics-council-response/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/johnson-johnson-opposes-labelling-nanocosmetics-council-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the 2012 review of New Zealand&#8217;s cosmetics regulations, global personal care products company Johnson and Johnson opposed labelling of nanocosmetic ingredients. The company requested a further opportunity to make [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/johnson-johnson-opposes-labelling-nanocosmetics-council-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labelling nanocosmetics welcome but more needed to manage risks</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/labelling-nanocosmetics-welcome-but-more-needed-to-manage-risks/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/labelling-nanocosmetics-welcome-but-more-needed-to-manage-risks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, the EPA came forward with a proposal to label nanoscale cosmetic ingredients as part of a number of proposed amendments to the cosmetics regulations. The Sustainability Council made [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/labelling-nanocosmetics-welcome-but-more-needed-to-manage-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case for proper regulation of nanocosmetics</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/1116/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/1116/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 03:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, the Council urged ERMA to propose mandatory labelling and safety testing of nanoscale cosmetic ingredients and that it review the regulatory definition of the nanoscale to ensure that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/1116/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council proposes rules for nanocosmetic ingredients</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/council-proposes-rules-for-nanocosmetic-ingredients/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/council-proposes-rules-for-nanocosmetic-ingredients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, the Sustainability Council wrote to ERMA, urging that in the annual review of cosmetics regulation, the regulator propose mandatory labelling and risk assessment of nanoscale cosmetic ingredients and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/council-proposes-rules-for-nanocosmetic-ingredients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protect public health with rules for nanocosmetics &#8211; 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/protect-public-health-with-rules-for-nanocosmetics-2010/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/protect-public-health-with-rules-for-nanocosmetics-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 03:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosafety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/?p=1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2010, the Sustainability Council urged ERMA to introduce proper labelling and mandatory safety testing of nanoscale cosmetic ingredients during its annual review of cosmetics regulations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sustainabilitynz.org/protect-public-health-with-rules-for-nanocosmetics-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
